[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Apple Drops Backward Compatibility for Next MacOS

Subject: Re: Apple Drops Backward Compatibility for Next MacOS
From: Paul Ho <paulcho@w3com.com>
Date: 1996/11/05
Newsgroups: comp.sys.be, comp.sys.mac.advocacy, comp.sys.apple2
Organization: w3com
References: <5344fe$36v@masters0.news.internex.net> <54o8mq$1pm8@uni.library.ucla.edu> <54p0bq$678@opal.southwind.net> <55bn28$9tv@opal.southwind.net> <4NOV199615033782@vax2.concordia.ca>

Mitchell Spector wrote:
> 
[...]
>     I highly disagree. With the expection of AV Macs with DSP chips, all
> past and current Macintosh systems have very limited sound capabilities.
[...]
>     There are _no_ music synthesis capabilities available! Not even something
> as basic as FM-synthesis, which was popular a few years back on IBM PC with
> cards such as the AdLib and SoundBlaster. Today PC's have wavetable music
> cards, a more advanced version of the Ensoniq the Apple IIgs used.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Apple Drops Backward Compatibility for Next MacOS
  - From: pubpc1@library.ucla.edu

References:
- Re: Apple Drops Backward Compatibility for Next MacOS
  - From: pubpc1@library.ucla.edu
- Re: Apple Drops Backward Compatibility for Next MacOS
  - From: shack@onyx.southwind.net (Randy Shackelford)
- Re: Apple Drops Backward Compatibility for Next MacOS
  - From: shack@onyx.southwind.net (Randy Shackelford)
- Re: Apple Drops Backward Compatibility for Next MacOS
  - From: spec@vax2.concordia.ca (Mitchell Spector)

Prev by Date: Re: Chat to girls!
Next by Date: [no subject]
Previous by thread: Re: Apple Drops Backward Compatibility for Next MacOS
Next by thread: Re: Apple Drops Backward Compatibility for Next MacOS
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread