[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Apple Drops Backward Compatibility for Next MacOS



pubpc1@library.ucla.edu wrote:
: shack@onyx.southwind.net (Randy Shackelford) wrote:
: >pubpc1@library.ucla.edu wrote:
: >
: >: Also people should remember: if Apple kept the GS alive and supported
: >: it like it supported them, GS sales would fuel WDC's R&D.  Faster 65816
: >: chips and 32-bit versions of them would come out at a faster rate as
: >: a result of the R&D bucks.
: >
: >This is a crock. You don't think enough SNES boxes were sold to keep WDC's
: >R&D going?

: They weren't computers.  You have to understand that game boxes don't
: need fast CPUs as much.  They have dedicated chips for moving graphics
: around.  They sold, yes, but the demand wasn't there for faster chips.
: Look, the SNES works the same with a 3MHz or 14MHz chip, but the 3MHz
: one is cheaper.  Of course Nintendo will buy the cheap one.

So you're saying that WDC could only develop new processors using revenue from
sales to Apple. Boloney.
--
Randy Shackelford
shack@southwind.net