[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Apple the Strategy For next 10 years
- Subject: Re: Apple the Strategy For next 10 years
- From: xyzzy@ponyexpress.net (Edward Franks)
- Date: 1996/10/27
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: PonyExpress Net
- References: <54dn2e$5e8@nuacht.iol.ie> <54vkm4$6tf@newsbf02.news.aol.com>
RUBYWAND has a great posting...
>
[Snip]
> Incredibly, not one major computer maker seems to have understood
> what so many users-- of Apple II's, of Commodore 64's, ...-- knew as a
> matter of common sense: the home computing market is the center of power.
> Dominate the home market with its millions of users and the other markets
> must, eventually, be yours as well.
Demonstratably not true. The IBM PC dominated the business
market and from there moved into the home market. The place to start
is with the _business_ market. One of the reasons the "average"
computer buyer uses to justify the purchase of a particular type of
micro is that the micro must run the same software as the micro they
use at work. Most (by most I mean the non-hobbyist, non-enthusiast)
people's exposure to micros come from the machines they use at work.
Also, please consider this idea, most businesses have a micro at
every desk, but not every home has a single PC in it. Remember too,
it is businesses that have the money to move to new platforms, en-
masse.
How many "average" people will buy new computers like they do
new cars? Most of the "average" people I know want to buy a computer
and have it be useful for them for the next five to ten years.
It is businesses that are on a three to five year replacement
cycle. This is where new micros (and software) can slip in easier.
I think the home market conquers the world strategy was only
workable once. Apple blew their chance and now any world conquering
strategy will have to displace the IBM PC in its stronghold: the
business arena.
[Snip]
> By 1987 some of us began to regret the colossal blunders of the
> competition, including, even, IBM. The PC had, so to speak, "escaped
> cultivation". In the hands of low-profit clone makers, it ceased to be
> merely a business machine with a few home users. Like some strange weed,
> PC was mutating and spreading rapidly into the home market. IBM had
> created the ultimate computer virus: basically, an Intel-based 'Apple II'
> which neither it nor any other single manufacturer could control.
I *like* this idea!
Too bad Apple IIs couldn't have '"escaped cultivation"'. They
might have survived Apple's marketing blunders better. ('The NEW
Compaq Apple ][+ Pro/GS running at 250MHz with 128MB RAM and 2 5.0GB
Hard drives!' 'Will IBM ever move out of it's 4.77 percent niche?')
The clone makers allowed the IBM PC market to survive IBM's
marketing blunders (anyone remember the PS/2s?) by making the machines
people wanted (or were willing to pay for <grin>).
>
> Once the clone PC propagated into the massive home user market, it
> became a creature of this market responding with AdLib Sound, VGA
> graphics, low-cost mass storage, etc., AND mushrooming support from major
> suppliers of entertainment software. PC is a textbook case of free-market
> capitalism in action.
Dead on. The IBM PC was a business machine first and had to
improve in order to enter the home market. Too bad Apple was willing
to improve the Apple IIs more to allow the IIs to enter the business
market.
[Snip]
> Any sober assessment of Apple's prospects must begin with the
> observation that the company's history does not lead one to anticipate
> innovative, daring strategems. So, perhaps, we should expect Apple and
> Mac-- kicking, screaming, and wailing-- to slide down 'the big tube'
> together.
Right on! Even the Mac was a pirate project in AppleLand. The
irony to me is that Apple's current survival depends on a project most
wanted to kill.
> Still, survival is an excellent motivator. Apple, Inc. may, yet,
> adopt a II-based strategy and battle PC for the home market. It's late in
> the game; but, when you're dead anyway, you might as well make interesting
> moves.
Excellent posting. I enjoy reading and thinking about what you
said, even when I didn't agree with everything.
Thanks,
Edward
--
Edward Franks
efranks@msn.com
xyzzy@ponyexpress.net
-==(UDIC)==- Fortran Dragon
Microsoft Certified Product Specialist: Windows 3.1
"Ain't I a stinker?" - Bugs Bunny