Re: Lynx/GS/Proterm3.1

[bird@MCS.COM (J. L. Walters)]

In article <dmiller.835806786@c4systm.com>,
David Miller <dmiller@egmont.c4systm.com> wrote:
>gtolar@concentric.net (Glynne Tolar) writes:

>> A darn shame InTrec has made no moves to improve ProTerm.

Unh, how about 2.1 --> 3.0 and 3.0 --> 3.1?

>> Chosing rather to suck up to the Mac.

I don't think this comment is relevant to anything. When a company
decides they have to look at the market, their expertise, etc., etc.,
and see what will propell the company into the next decade choosing a
platform that is no longer being sold is just asking for Dr. K to make
a visit ;-O

> Last I heard, they WERE planning to update the Apple II version of 
> ProTERM again as soon as ProTERM Mac 1.1 was out the door.

I don't believe so. Greg was working on a PC version in tandom with
the Mac version until it became too much so he put the PC on the shelf
until he finished with the Mac. Once that is done I'm sure he will
pick up where he left off on the PC version.

Once that is done it will be time for an update to the Mac version.
Once that is done it will be time for an update to the PC  version...

Don't hold your breath for an update to PT3, the market just isn't
there.

Kind Regards,
-- 
	Joe Walters:  bird@mcs.com or J.L.Walters@genie.com
	The sound of your horn is far sweeter if blown by somebody else.