[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Turing Test Meaningless?
- Subject: Re: Turing Test Meaningless?
- From: wbaguhn@nyx10.cs.du.edu (Will Baguhn)
- Date: 1996/04/30
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: I am the error in apps of delight
- References: <4lgnj3$n9@nntp.seflin.lib.fl.us> <4lq986$2u6@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <4ltd20$gfl@nyx10.cs.du.edu> <4m2h2k$m8f@nntp.seflin.lib.fl.us>
In article <4m2h2k$m8f@nntp.seflin.lib.fl.us>,
Ralph Silverman <z007400b@bcfreenet.seflin.lib.fl.us> wrote:
>Will Baguhn (wbaguhn@nyx10.cs.du.edu) wrote:
>: HEY FOLKS....
>
>: this isn't comp.ai . this is comp.sys.apple2, remember. i know that i
>: have been yelling at ralph via email f for this getting here, but come on..
>: don't reply to them on c.s.a2... hmm?
>
>--
>***********begin r.s. response*************
>
> those who are interested in such
> things
> might ask
> why accept the
> authority
> of the poster cited above?
>
> also
> yes,
> have been getting flamed via email
> left and right for this and the like...
>
>***********end r.s. response***************
>Ralph Silverman
>z007400b@bcfreenet.seflin.lib.fl.us
>
WHY? it's simple. you're posting comp.ai.* material in comp.sys.apple2 .
comp.sys.apple2 for the most part isn't interested in comp.ai.* . those
that ARE interested can see it in comp.ai.* .