[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Curiosity about Apple II designations



In article <4jhlt5$7oa@acme.freenet.columbus.oh.us> dalloff@freenet.columbus.oh.us (Dave Althoff) writes:
>
>I think the
>"e" designation was used because calling it the Apple ][++ would look
>stupid

Although in hindsight, it could have been a big marketing plus plus!

-Sheldon