[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Micro$loth Windoze 95 Badges - how they should be
- Subject: Re: Micro$loth Windoze 95 Badges - how they should be
- From: diggins@mcmaster.ca (Mike Diggins)
- Date: 1995/09/07
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.misc, comp.sys.mac.hardware.misc, aus.computers.ibm-pc, aus.computers.sun, aus.computers.os2, aus.computers.amiga, comp.sys.amiga.misc, comp.sys.apple2, comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc, comp.sys.intel, comp.sys.mac.programmer.misc, comp.sys.misc, comp.s
- Organization: McMaster University
- References: <Pine.ULT.3.91.950904132020.12842B-100000@student.uq.edu.au> <42f93k$chn@data.interserv.net> <erik-0409951259280001@192.0.2.1> <42g0e7$kvs@itchy.itsnet.com> <jdoe-0409952145240001@m13.mccabe.swarthmore.edu> <42gfvk$o7c@itchy.itsnet.com>
In article <erik-0709950026350001@192.0.2.1> erik@hypermall.com (Erik Kloeppel) writes:
>From: erik@hypermall.com (Erik Kloeppel)
>Subject: Re: Micro$loth Windoze 95 Badges - how they should be
>Date: Thu, 7 Sep 1995 07:26:34 GMT
>as an individual who has used OS/2, Windoze, MS-DOS, UNIX, GS/OS, ProDOS,
>Apple DOS 3.3, and a couple others I'd rather not think about, I can
>definately say that Windoze belong with the group of "stuff I'd rather
>avoid because it's too stupid to live". OS/2 isn't the end-all/be-all of
>operating systems either, but I'd rather use it than anything from
>Microsoft.
So use it then. If you were so comfortable with your decision you wouldn't
be here pleading your case to the world. The more posts I see from disgruntled
OS/2 users the more I realize how nervous your getting. It's sad really.
Mike