[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Apple II+ - "all" memory bad... surely not?

Subject: Re: Apple II+ - "all" memory bad... surely not?
From: dog_cow@macgui.com (D Finnigan)
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 19:41:39 +0000 (UTC)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Organization: Mac GUI
References: <c9597830-88f6-4ef5-ad12-6bd33883e57b@19g2000yqu.googlegroups.com> <8fe8aa84-1fbd-4d13-abb7-548906283e62@q21g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>
User-agent: Mac GUI City Usenet Posting
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.sys.apple2:16671

N.N. Thayer wrote:
> 
> CULPRITS:
> 
> 74LS04
> 74LS138
> 
> The service notes posted by Mike Willegal were invaluable!
>

Nice. Glad that another person found them to be useful. If you're
interested, here's the story behind them:

http://macgui.com/usenet/?group=1&id=23740

The originals are in France, and I got to see them over the Winter holiday!

-- 
Mac GUI Vault - A source for retro Apple II and Macintosh
computing.
http://macgui.com/vault/

References:
- Apple II+ - "all" memory bad... surely not?
  - From: "N.N. Thayer" <nnthayer@hotmail.com>
- Re: Apple II+ - "all" memory bad... surely not?
  - From: "N.N. Thayer" <nnthayer@hotmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: GS + CD300e Plus
Next by Date: v0.12 Re: Work in progress free firmware substitute
Previous by thread: Re: Apple II+ - "all" memory bad... surely not?
Next by thread: GS + CD300e Plus
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread