[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Why does nobody want Pegasus P?

Subject: Re: Why does nobody want Pegasus P?
From: radelgre@cnct.com (Rob Del Greco)
Date: 25 Sep 1994 00:33:46 -0400
Followup-to: comp.sys.apple2,comp.sys.apple2.programmer
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2, comp.sys.apple2.programmer
Organization: The Connection
References: <Cw8p0M.LwJ@tiamet.uucp> <CwGCn0.HBG@actrix.gen.nz>
Xref: bga.com comp.sys.apple2:10736 comp.sys.apple2.programmer:1766

: - It is an oddball language.  I don't intend to continue programming
: the IIgs forever, and learning another IIgs-specific language would be
: a waste of time.

Pascal is a portable languages. We use it in school, so I have seen 
compilers for Macs, DOS, and Apple IIs (not through school). Its main use 
is as a learning language because it almost shoves organization down your 
throat. If you can program it in Pascal, you can do it in anything.

Robert Del Greco
radelgre@cnct.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why does nobody want Pegasus P?
  - From: ltchean@iss.nus.sg (Lim Thye Chean)
- Re: Why does nobody want Pegasus P?
  - From: dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson)

References:
- Why does nobody want Pegasus P?
  - From: ken@tiamet.uucp (Ken O Burtch)
- Re: Why does nobody want Pegasus P?
  - From: dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson)

Prev by Date: Re: ImageQuant 0.3
Next by Date: Re: FTP Apple Sights
Previous by thread: Re: Why does nobody want Pegasus P?
Next by thread: Re: Why does nobody want Pegasus P?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread