[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Grind FTP site
- Subject: Re: Grind FTP site
- From: rwifall@nmsu.edu (Richard J Wifall)
- Date: 7 Sep 1994 02:29:22 GMT
- Distribution: world
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM
- References: <34i6ep$2f6j@blue.weeg.uiowa.edu> <34ifni$10mm@blue.weeg.uiowa.edu>
Steven Nelson (snelson@blue.weeg.uiowa.edu) wrote:
: From article <34i6ep$2f6j@blue.weeg.uiowa.edu>, by snelson@blue.weeg.uiowa.edu (Steven Nelson):
[Read the original message]
: Yes. Ian has replied that it is indeed his demand that these files be
: deleted immediately or he will take legal action against grind.isca. He
: claims that Charles Turley made slanderous and untrue accusations against
: him. He reports than Genie and Aol have already deleted these files.
: Grind is expected to follow suit or he WILL take legal action.
: I'm not a lawyer. I don't know what grounds Ian has for his request.
As a responsible administrator you _should_ have removed the
files from public access and then if they were found to be legal
(which they aren't) placed them back once the issue was settled.
Since I am also share the copyright for the IRC disks, and you
have failed to remove them it looks like I have no choice but to visit
the university lawyer tommorrow to determine my options.
[Stuff about NoiseTracker deleted since it does not directly effect.
However, I might point out that Ian does have the copyright to any
code that he added and therefore he has copyright to portions of the
NTGS file that is in question.]
: At any rate, Ian needs to be more careful with whom he shares his
: source code in the future, and whom he gets his source code from in
: the first place.
I hate to be blunt, but are you just clueless? Several times
I know both Ian and I have stated that they were _disassembled_ source
codes. [excluding NTGS] This means that someone took the binary
program and using orca disassembler reverted it to source code. Ian
didn't give his source code to anyone. [again excluding NTGS]
Even if he had given his source code to someone untrustworthy,
it still would be illegal to upload it without Ians permission.
: I'll wait for 24 hours for replies to my earlier post. At that time
My interpretation:
"I'll let grind break the law for 24 hours before I decide whether I
should honor the law or not."
: I'll either delete the files in question or shut down the FTP site
: until Ian and Charles settle the matter in court. Whichever option
: gets the most support in the next 24 hours wins. Grind/apple2 loses,
: either way. :-(
The apple2 is going to loose a hell of a lot more if you leave
the files up there. The shit (pardon my language Joe) that you have
to put up with programming/supporting the GS sure is amazing some days.
Is there anyway we could get a new Administrator for Grind who
actually has somewhat of a clue about copyright laws, and could set up
a usable hiearchy of directories?
: Sorry, but Ian is very dogmatic about this. Your input is important.
The general public's input is irrelevant. The copyright holders'
wishes are all that hold any relevance.
: --Steve (steven-nelson@uiowa.edu)
: (apple2pd@grind.isca.uiowa.edu)
Richard
--
rwifall@nmsu.edu