[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Track/sector staggering



In article <mobrienCrny8w.2tD@netcom.com> mobrien@netcom.com (Michael O'Brien) writes:
}mnementh@netcom.com (David R. Villegas) writes:
}> The physical sector order on each track is 0 7 E 6 D 5 C 4 B 3 A 2 9 1 
}8 F.
}
}Thanks for replying.  However, that's not exactly what I'm talking about.
}Let me rephrase my question: if I read sector 0 and then immediately seek
}to the next track, what will be the next sector under the read head?  I bet
}it's not 7.

"Undefined".  Only copy-protection schemes made an attempt to
synchronize the tracks in any way at all.  (and I suspect there were
many different ways they did it)



-- 
Matthew T. Russotto	russotto@eng.umd.edu
Some news readers expect "Disclaimer:" here.
Just say NO to police searches and seizures.  Make them use force.
(not responsible for bodily harm resulting from following above advice)