Re: A New Game for the GS!

[drees@cs.UND.NoDak.Edu (Steven H. Drees)]

In article <2r8avu$6hn@jadzia.csos.orst.edu>,
Critical Mass <daye@CSOS.ORST.EDU> wrote:
>In article <2r81qa$sr4@crl.crl.com>, Joe Kohn <joko@crl.com> wrote:
[Joe says we need a net.cop]
>
>If this is what we want, why didn't we vote for a moderated c.b.a2 when the
>opportunity provided itself?  Is it time to rehash that old subject once
>again for public consideration, maybe?
>

I second that motion. Moderation of c.b.a2 is a Good Thing (tm).
This whole _reactionary_ flame war would have been avoided if moderation had
passed the last time we voted on it. There really are no good reasons to
vote against moderation.


>|Evan Day                | "Plans made in the nursery can change the


-- 
Steve Drees  
drees@agassiz.cas.und.nodak.edu