Re: Upgrades R US. (was Re: SS GNO)

[ultimav@vax1.mankato.msus.edu (Everybody knows!....)]

In article <2pgt51INNa5p@charnel.ecst.csuchico.edu>, jamesb@ecst.csuchico.edu (James L Brookes) writes:
> In article <2pgbbkINNghb@kirk.ms.detemobil.de>, Kevin Henigan
> <henigan@kirk.ms.DeTeMobil.de> wrote:
> 
> [Nathan Mates wrote]
>>>   Yep. Twilight II 2.0 will be coming out this June
>>
>>Good, I hope this update isn't going to cost anything/much.
> 
>    That's not exactly fair.  Software developers make a lot of money
> on updates; in fact, if they don't expect to make money on the updates

Stuf about TII 2.0 slashed

>    Time to hop onto my soapbox...
> 
Part of ivory soapbox cleansed:
> 
>    To summarize: I think people need to be a little more willing to
> pay for upgrades to products they use.  If enough people don't upgrade
> then it is simply not worth a developers while to continue developing.
> This may sound strange, but I actually look forward to the opportunity
> to "vote" (by spending money) for my favorite products by upgrading
> them.  I guess it makes me feel like I'm doing my part to keep
> the developer working on the product I use.

> |          James Brookes            | Inet: bb252@cleveland.freenet.edu |

 	James.. I believe you have the *insert favorite phrase* 
I agree with you 100%.., Just today, i sent out $30 just for developers of
II products, and thats more than one. You pretty much covered about most of
what was thinking of when i read the original article.

Lets see if more people see the light( or $ in this case)
	Paying for things is not *BAD* it a fact of life.. LIVE with it, and
support your develops while there is still time..


oowww. I forgot i should have posted this from unix,

/dana/*writinga alias to flames=/dev/null from a vax*

-- 

   ._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._.
   :: Dana Cleveland                                                      ::
   :: Internet : ultimav@vax1.mankato.msus.edu      Genie: D.Cleveland6   ::