[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ProTERM 3.1 DEMO on cco.caltech.edu

Subject: Re: ProTERM 3.1 DEMO on cco.caltech.edu
From: flan@froggy.wustl.edu (Ian Flanigan)
Date: Sun, 16 May 1993 00:27:27 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Organization: Washington University, St. Louis MO
References: <ec64214@pro-applejacks.cts.com> <1993May14.110319.769@iwsd01.itwol.bhp.com.au>
Sender: usenet@wuecl.wustl.edu (News Administrator)

In article <1993May14.110319.769@iwsd01.itwol.bhp.com.au> WEZAMG@itwol.bhp.com.au (George ZAMROZ) writes:
>Excuse me, but while the graphics on the GS may not be great, the sound blows
>most things out of the water. You name one machine that comes with sound
>capability as good as the GS as standard.

The NeXT comes to mind.  Though they aren't in production any longer.

-- 
Ian Flanigan

Washington University in St. Louis	"You can never have too many napkins."
flan@arl.wustl.edu

Follow-Ups:
- Re: ProTERM 3.1 DEMO on cco.caltech.edu
  - From: philip@utstat.toronto.edu (Philip McDunnough)

References:
- Re: ProTERM 3.1 DEMO on cco.caltech.edu
  - From: pmichel@pro-applejacks.cts.com (Patrick Michel)
- Re: ProTERM 3.1 DEMO on cco.caltech.edu
  - From: WEZAMG@itwol.bhp.com.au (George ZAMROZ)

Prev by Date: Cache Chips for the ZIP
Next by Date: poll
Previous by thread: Re: IIGS Has Great Sound, But How Do You Take Advantage Of It?
Next by thread: Re: ProTERM 3.1 DEMO on cco.caltech.edu
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread