[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PT3
In article <fmlinC4wJ26.3qo@netcom.com> fmlin@netcom.com (Frank M. Lin) writes:
>- do we really need anything else in pt3? IMO, the _ONLY_ real limit is the
>editor. I can live with it even though it's ProDOS 8.
There's another _real_ limit ... macro size. GEM won't work with my normal
copy of PT3 because I have too many phone entries and stuff. That's not very
nice, I do not need 3.5MB scrollback and about 40k for macros or such ....
So, yes, let's bug InTrec about removing any and all memory limitations
they have set for PT3 :)
Soenke
>So, shall we start to flook Intrec's mailbox?
Maybe, but remain polite. Flaming them is surely not the way to go. No,
that's not directed at you, it's just the The Net at large is not always
very cautious with what gets written.
Soenke
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: PT3
- From: fmlin@netcom.com (Frank M. Lin)
- References:
- Re: PT3
- From: jmk3@crux1.cit.cornell.edu (Jay Krell)
- Re: PT3
- From: fmlin@netcom.com (Frank M. Lin)