[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PT3
> There seems to be no reason why we can't have a bigger editor. And
>it doesn't like it takes much to change it. Come on all pt3 owners! Let's
>all bug Intrec to give a quick v3.1 update with user selectable
>editor buffer/transfer buffer/code cache buffer. Let's do it!
Frank,
I'm all for a bigger editor buffer, but that is the wrong attitude. With the
current architecture, there is a good reason for the size limit - the block of
memory can be no bigger. We don't want a "quick" update, esp. if it will be the
last.
--
--Jay, jay.krell@cornell.edu
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: PT3
- From: fmlin@netcom.com (Frank M. Lin)
- Re: PT3
- From: stc7@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Steven T Chiang)
- References:
- Re: PT3
- From: tony@shakala.com (Tony Andrews)