Re: PT3

[stc7@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Steven T Chiang)]

In article <jmk3.733823961@crux1.cit.cornell.edu> jmk3@crux1.cit.cornell.edu (Jay Krell) writes:
> 
>> There seems to be no reason why we can't have a bigger editor.  And
>>it doesn't like it takes much to change it.  Come on all pt3 owners!  Let's
>>all bug Intrec to give a quick v3.1 update with user selectable
>>editor buffer/transfer buffer/code cache buffer.  Let's do it!
> 
>Frank,
>  I'm all for a bigger editor buffer, but that is the wrong attitude. With the
>current architecture, there is a good reason for the size limit - the block of
>memory can be no bigger. We don't want a "quick" update, esp. if it
>will be the last.

	Well, if Intrec wanted to hack it, they could just give you a
bigger editor and just move data in to bank 0 or 1 (wherever it's
stored) from higher memory...  Heck, somebody might even be able to
patch pt3...

Steven Chiang                  Order - DreamGrafix:  The ONLY 16/256/3200
stc7@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu       color paint program for the Apple IIGS.
America On_Line:  DWS Steve
Genie:  S.Chiang4              Apple IIGS Forever!