[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Ramfast
- Subject: Re: Ramfast
- From: "Volker Herrmann" <CD46@DKAUNI2.BITNET>
- Date: 15 Feb 1993 08:47:20 +0100
- Distribution: world
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: University of Karlsruhe, Germany
- Sender: usenet@nz12.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de
Ian Scmidt wrote:
> In article <01GUPV57N9Z48Y6988@ALBION.BITNET> AKARPENKO@ALBION.BITNET writes:
> >What is the difference between revision C and D?
> >Thanks.
>
> Rev D is a much smaller, cooler, less power-hungry board. It has special
> circuitry so it can do DMA to incompatible cards (unless a TransSuck GS is
> in the system; Zips work fine). There's no real speed difference or software
> difference.
Does the ZIP really work fine?
I have a PlusRam GS8 memory board with 6 MB and it could be expanded to
8MB. This board is _not_ DMA compatible. It could be made, but then you
can access only 4 MB. My RAMFast rev D works flawlessly in the none-DMA
mode (BTW 1 MB cache).
About half a year ago I thought of buying a ZIP. But everybody I asked
told me that it would not work with a card that is not DMA compatible!
So I refused to buy one.
Now you are telling that the ZIP works fine... Now what?
Volker - apple2gs@tchibm2.chemie.uni-karlsruhe.de