Re: still 65802 problem:PS

[toddpw@cco.caltech.edu (Todd P. Whitesel)]

ken@cup.hp.com (Ken Sumrall) writes:

> The 6502 was fully static and the clock could be stopped
>either in the high or low state.

References? All the data sheets I've seen have it that the original 6502 was
always non-static. Only with the 65c02 were static versions actually offered.

>  The 65802/65816 are not static, and the
>clock can be stopped in one state indefinately, but in the other state it
>can only be stopped for a maximum of 10 micro-seconds.

This is true of the standard parts. The microcontroller versions are usually
fully static so they can be run at slow speed (or no speed) to save power.

Todd Whitesel
toddpw @ cco.caltech.edu