[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Which accelerator?



In article <a772730@pro-ace.cts.com> wsheffield@pro-ace.cts.com (Wayne Sheffield) writes:
>In <1ifj42INN304@newsman.csu.murdoch.edu.au>
>hinchlif@csuvax1.csu.murdoch.edu.au (Peter Hinchliffe) writes:
>
>>Sincere thanks to all those who responded to my post. To a man (no sexism
>>intended :)) everyone said Zip Zip Zip!! So Zip it is. I'm heading for life
>>in the fast lane folks!
>>
>>Impatience is a vice.
>>
>HOLD ON THERE!  I just read (in the Jan, 1993 NAUG) that Zip Technology is
>in chapter 11.  They cannot find anyone to make their ZipChips (//e, //c
>replacements), and their future is uncertain.  They ARE still manufacturing
>the ZipGS accelerator cards, but before you purchase it, consider their
>financial standing.

As far as I know, it is still okay to purchase things from Zip Technology,
chapter 11 is simply protection from creditors, and I do believe they
were out of chapter 11 for a while during the past 2 years.  The last
I've heard is that Zip has found a new manufacture/contractor for
the Zip Chip 8 Mhz for the IIe, but it's not a trivial matter to
start the production process, so they'll need about 4 month to restart.
All in all, I think rumor of this sort can really help destroy a company
(I am not placing blame on you, of course, and this is not a flame of any-
kind, since I know you are trying to help a fellow user make a wise
investment decision :-), and the last I've heard is that the NAUG writer
had a miscommunications with the CEO of Zip Tech (Debra), and they
printed some statements that were false.

Think of this as the old "oh no, inCider/A+ has change their format
for good, and gone Macintosh" travesty of a couple of month back :-)

Hope this calms a few nerves...


Jimmy

--
Jimmy Shaw		      RamFAST, ZipGSX and 6.0... Apple II Forever!
jimmys@ics.uci.edu
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------