[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Apple II Magazines

Subject: Re: Apple II Magazines
From: Mike Spurgeon <mike@spurgeon.net>
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2009 17:01:50 -0700
In-reply-to: <2009040707571116807-noneya@noneyacom>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
References: <71c09bbf-5a45-4950-a1e6-7b670a10dbbe@h28g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> <1a772c8b-c2ff-4636-9ab2-d872afd925a3@r5g2000prh.googlegroups.com> <a2ejt49rou358b09fc85r6e18s3u4oc7v7@4ax.com> <Hc6dnSswCt_EfkfUnZ2dnUVZ_uGdnZ2d@giganews.com> <2009040707571116807-noneya@noneyacom>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302)
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.sys.apple2:10089

noneya wrote:

Your not factoring that the magazine is worth less now as opposed to1989...


How so?  Try to buy them all, and tell us if you pay more or less.

Otherwise your logic would mean most vintage computers on ebaywould be worth buying simply because they cost less than the original MSRP.


Is that how they teach logic now?

I am personally appreciative that the magazines are scanned andavailable, but lets not pretend your getting something that has any sortof marketability beyond a very small group of grateful enthusiasts.


Ever heard of 'willing buyer' and willing seller' establishing price?

References:
- Apple II Magazines
  - From: rhohler <rick.hohler@gmail.com>
- Re: Apple II Magazines
  - From: Polymorph <polymorph69@hotmail.com>
- Re: Apple II Magazines
  - From: bob <bob@itel.net>
- Re: Apple II Magazines
  - From: scott@alfter.DIESPAMMERSDIE.us (Scott Alfter)
- Re: Apple II Magazines
  - From: noneya <noneya@noneya.com>

Prev by Date: Re: The Woz to lose weight!
Next by Date: Re: Apple II Magazines
Previous by thread: Re: Apple II Magazines
Next by thread: Re: Apple II Magazines
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread