[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: More fun with Freed Z80
- Subject: Re: More fun with Freed Z80
- From: "a2retro" <a2retro@a2central.com.remove-xpq-this>
- Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:17:25 -0500
- In-reply-to: <gnb8gm$gau$1@adenine.netfront.net>
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: A2Central.com
- References: <gnb8gm$gau$1@adenine.netfront.net>
- Reply-to: rg.jones@rogers.com
- User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209)
- Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.sys.apple2:8856
To: Alex Freed
Alex Freed wrote:
a2retro wrote:
Sorry I am a little confused - that part is supposed to be NVSRAM
already.
I am sorry. I didn't expect a lot of people to read that schematics too
closely :)
I go to the source when I want to know something. :)
The used SRAM chip has nothing to do with DS1245. I just used a library
part with the right pinout.
I was starting to think that based on your earlier answers. No worries -
I have done the same thing myself.
The actual part used is AS6C1008 (128K) or
AS6C4008 (512K).
Those who got a kit are of course free to experiment with other chips
but these are pretty good for reasons mentioned.
I agree. I was surprised to see you specify a NVRAM part initially. One
of the reasons I looked more closely then others is I am making that
decision for my own project and I like to see what other people are
doing in similar situations.
I agree that having a RAM disk on an NV RAM is attractive, but not sure
the existing driver would not attempt to "reformat" it every time.
Also if files can be easily accessed on a ProDOS volume mounted on CFFA,
it becomes less important to have NV RAM.
True. These are the same questions and considerations I am working
through for my own project. One might think it's a simple thing to pick
a RAM chip but there are a lot of factors to be considered if you let
them creep in there.
Glenn