[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Question on ProDOS SmartPort drive remapping



glen herrmannsfeldt wrote:
Michael J. Mahon wrote:
(snip)

The original FORTRAN had limitations quite transparently derived from
the 704 architecture, and FORTRAN IV had the limitations raised in
accordance with the extensions of the 7094!
(snip)

The FREQUENCY statement that provided the probabilities of conditional
branches for this simulation was relatively short-lived, partly because
we now know that programmers tend to be *terrible* estimators of branch
probabilities!

Yes, but it was optional so I don't see why it needed to be
removed.  Now that branch prediction is more important, maybe
it should be added back again.

Is there a Fortran compiler for the Apple II?

-- glen


Yes! To bring this all back around to the beginning - running under the UCSD p-system no less. I'm sure I saw a CP/M version (or two) as well. I have never used it. Anyone? I was lucky (?) in that by the time I got to college, we had a choice of using Fortran or Pascal. I used Pascal (pi), the interpreted version. When you have over a hundred engineering students trying to share one dual vax 11/780, you choose the path of least compile :-)

Dave...