Re: ADT under Apple II emulation on Apple III?

[schmidtd <schmidtd@my-deja.com>]

On Dec 4, 8:08 pm, "N.N. Thayer" <nntha...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 4, 7:03 pm, "Michael J. Mahon" <mjma...@aol.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > N.N. Thayer wrote:
> > > On Dec 4, 6:56 pm, "N.N. Thayer" <nntha...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > >>On Dec 4, 6:52 pm, "N.N. Thayer" <nntha...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > >>>I haven't gotten around to messing with any drivers yet, but I ran
> > >>>into this doc...
>
> > >>>http://www.apple2.org.za/mirrors/ground.icaen.uiowa.edu/MiscInfo/Misc...
>
> > >>>...which stated that the serial port was assigned slot 7 in emulation
> > >>>mode.  Previously, I'd only tried the most common slots used for
> > >>>serial cards.  I was hoping that I'd just been a total idiot, but no,
> > >>>that didn't work.  :(
>
> > >>>Also, I need to correct my description of the II emulation control
> > >>>panel.  There is no selection for the SSC - unsurprising, since it
> > >>>came out after the III - just "serial."  The full panel, with my
> > >>>selected options in asterisks, is as follows:
>
> > >>>LANGUAGE: *APPLESOFT* INTEGER BASIC
> > >>>CARD: *SERIAL* COMMUNICATIONS
> > >>>BAUD RATE: 110 300 600 1200 2400 4800 9600 *19200*
> > >>>LINE FEED: *ENABLED* DISABLED
> > >>>LINE WIDTH: 40 72 80 132 *INF*
> > >>>CARRIAGE RETURN DELAY: *ON* OFF
>
> > >>.......you know, looking at that, why don't I just try the version of
> > >>ADT made for the Communications Card?
>
> > >>*thumps head against wall*
>
> > > On second thought, even if I did get that working, it would probably
> > > be too slow (I'm assuming here that only the Comm Card's original
> > > 110/300 bps are available under emulation).  I'd like to take
> > > advantage of the full 19200 bps.
>
> > Or the full 115kbps if a 6551 is used.  ;-)
>
> > -michael
>
> > NadaPong: Network game demo for Apple II computers!
> > Home page:  http://members.aol.com/MJMahon/
>
> > "The wastebasket is our most important design
> > tool--and it's seriously underused."
>
> But how would I access that if the emulation caps it at 19200?
Because software that tweaks the hardware instead of going through a
driver layer can do that. ;-)