[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Write Signal on Disk II Question
- Subject: Re: Write Signal on Disk II Question
- From: Linards Ticmanis <ticmanis@gmx.de>
- Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 13:44:09 +0100
- In-reply-to: <1194817188.506052.311720@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com>
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: Arcor
- References: <473500c1$0$32532$4c368faf@roadrunner.com><nf9Zi.38$OJ.0@trndny06> <5RhZi.60$Vp3.32@trnddc05> <4735d085$0$8807$4c368faf@roadrunner.com> <rjnZi.1348$VB6.450@trnddc06> <47364055$0$32548$4c368faf@roadrunner.com> <DvuZi.1791$jH2.405@trnddc01> <47368074$0$20642$4c368faf@roadrunner.com> <1194817188.506052.311720@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com>
- User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070801)
- Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:30419
ferdimh@gmx.de wrote:
> Using a '74 one can reencode the signal read from disk and write it to
> another disk at the same time. Then you only need to step over the
> tracks while reading and you shold have a working copy (maybe you'll
> need some circuitry to avoid writing during the seek).
A good idea, however it won't work if you start/end the writing in the
middle of a sector. The rotation speed is not constant enough to "hit"
the exact same bit the next time around. So you will need to start/end
the write in a gap. This means you have to detect gaps. Also, nibble
counts won't be exact without taking extra measures. So the idea of
doing this entirely "dumb" is probably not workable.
--
Linards Ticmanis