[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Complete Basic?



Paul Schlyter wrote:
In article <1189695437.293680.48560@r29g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>,
Eric  <englere_geo@yahoo.com> wrote:


On Sep 13, 12:01 am, David Schmenk <dschm...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:


The II had a purpose and focus.  It was the computer Woz wanted for
himself to explore what it meant to be a microcomputer.  It came out of
the box ready to explore.

I wish there were something like this today. Today's young people are
discouraged from getting under the hood to the low-level assembler.
Many of them really don't understand what is going on. Their high
level software APIs wrap all the cool stuff we really enjoyed :-(


And they're far from alone in not understanding what happens "under
the hood".  I remember reading a column by P.J. Plaugher (well-known C
and Unix veteran) some years ago in "C User's Journal", where he
described getting his first Windows NT machine up and running.  He
wrote that for the first time in his life, he didn't understand much
of what was happening in the computer he was about to use....  he too
was missing the computers of the past, which were simple enough to be
understandable.

Reminds me of Bjarne Stroustrup's clever comment:

"I have always wished that my computer would be as easy to use as my telephone. My wish has come true. I no longer know how to use my telephone."

-michael

NadaPong: Network game demo for Apple II computers!
Home page:  http://members.aol.com/MJMahon/

"The wastebasket is our most important design
tool--and it's seriously underused."