Re: Apple IIGS ROM 1 or ROM 3, which is better?

[pausch@saaf.se (Paul Schlyter)]

In article <1184193574.809833.72420@n2g2000hse.googlegroups.com>,
josephoswaldgg@hotmail.com <josephoswald@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Jul 11, 2:42 pm, "Michael J. Mahon" <mjma...@aol.com> wrote:
>> mdj wrote:
>>> On Jul 2, 11:23 am, "Michael J. Mahon" <mjma...@aol.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>With object orientation comes a surplus of indirection.  ;-)
> 
>>  From the point of view of speed, *avoidable* indirection is a
>> *very* bad thing.  Memory latency is hundreds of processor
>> cycles, at least.
> 
> Hey, this is comp.sys.apple2. We don't have wait-states on our memory!
> We don't need no steenking caches!
> 
> Our level 1 cache is our level 2 cache is our main RAM. And that new-
> fangled IIgs has thousands of KB. Enough for anybody!

Almost like Bill Gates old comment "640 KB is enough memory for anybody"
;-)

-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------
Paul Schlyter,  Grev Turegatan 40,  SE-114 38 Stockholm,  SWEDEN
e-mail:  pausch at stockholm dot bostream dot se
WWW:     http://stjarnhimlen.se/