[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: beagle compiler
- Subject: Re: beagle compiler
- From: Don Bruder <dakidd@sonic.net>
- Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 16:08:23 -0700
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: Chaotic Creations Unlimited
- References: <449512ed$0$928$ba4acef3@news.orange.fr> <4496de36$0$1024$ba4acef3@news.orange.fr> <huugg29uo6u0g0is3u9gjneed84vkolauc@4ax.com>
- User-agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.1 (PPC)
- Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.sys.apple2:12739
In article <huugg29uo6u0g0is3u9gjneed84vkolauc@4ax.com>,
"Steve ][" <sc-ii@hotmail.com> wrote:
> I don't have any direct help, but there was another compiler for
> Applesoft that came out a couple of years before the Beagle one,
> although I think the Beagle one was "better". Can anyone name that
> other compiler? I think I first took Telengard and compiled it and it
> was about 5x faster.
That would be the Microsoft Applesoft Basic compiler. It sucked serious
ass. I could almost literally "hand compile" my code faster, and come up
with cleaner, less bloated ML besides. (Which should probably come as no
surprise - Even in the early days, Microsoft code sucked.)
--
Don Bruder - dakidd@sonic.net - If your "From:" address isn't on my whitelist,
or the subject of the message doesn't contain the exact text "PopperAndShadow"
somewhere, any message sent to this address will go in the garbage without my
ever knowing it arrived. Sorry... <http://www.sonic.net/~dakidd> for more info