[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 6502 illegal opcodes questions
- Subject: Re: 6502 illegal opcodes questions
- From: "mdj" <mdj.mdj@gmail.com>
- Date: 3 Jun 2006 18:04:30 -0700
- Complaints-to: groups-abuse@google.com
- In-reply-to: <e5rv33$1ub2$1@merope.saaf.se>
- Injection-info: h76g2000cwa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=220.237.91.208; posting-account=W_jMEA0AAAAZdNaersJnc-7Hjv-SIC8Q
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.cbm, comp.sys.apple2, rec.games.video.classic
- Organization: http://groups.google.com
- References: <444be7a0$0$11080$9b4e6d93@newsread4.arcor-online.net> <e5jhcm$1oop$1@merope.saaf.se> <1149086466.883167.33940@y43g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> <4481759c$0$15787$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <e5rv33$1ub2$1@merope.saaf.se>
- User-agent: G2/0.2
- Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.sys.cbm:16254 comp.sys.apple2:8770 rec.games.video.classic:5420
Paul Schlyter wrote:
> I fully agree with that! The API is the specification, not the
> implementation. There might be some parts of the library which
> can be called by outside code but wasn't intended to be called in
> that way - they're not part of the API, even though they're part of
> the library!
Of course, if you use features of a library that aren't part of it's
documented interface you'll eventually be cursed by almost everybody.
Hey, we're almost back on topic, considering this was supposed to be
about 'undocumented opcodes' :-) Of course, my feelings on using
undocumented library calls is much the same as my feelings on
undocumented opcodes. They are very similar problems.
Matt