Re: Apple ][ Forth

["John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.com>]

In article <EJ6dnUoGPcs1-YveRVn-pQ@comcast.com>,
 "Bill Garber" <willy46pa@comcast.net> wrote:

> "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message 
> nospam-688185.21591131082005@news-rdr-02.ohiordc.rr.com">news:nospam-688185.21591131082005@news-rdr-02.ohiordc.rr.com...
> > In article <1125518771.968442.259430@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>,
> > "John" <zzzjoki@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > [...]
> >> qforth is more "Forth like" than Graforth, but no floating point, and
> >> few compiling words (like >DOES), there is a 2.3 (think) someplace with
> >> a few more words than 2.2.
> > [...]
> >
> > The QForth here <http://www.geocities.com/oneelkruns/qforth.html> is
> > version 2.4.
> 
> You probably should explain that those files are
> actually SHK files renamed to ZIP. Took me a sec
> to figure it out, but I'm glad that I did.  :o)
> 
> Bill Garber

Good point, Bill. Ron mentions this on the site, too. I guess I have to 
wonder why. Do browsers like it better? Does "shk" collide with some 
other file type?

Also check out:

<http://www.geocities.com/oneelkruns/>

-- 
John
jmatthews at wright dot edu
www dot wright dot edu/~john.matthews/