[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: How many times must Apple make such DRASTIC architecture changes?

Subject: Re: How many times must Apple make such DRASTIC architecture changes?
From: Kelly Hall <khall@acm.org>
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 10:12:46 GMT
In-reply-to: <3gvqu5FekdddU1@individual.net>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2, comp.sys.mac.system, comp.sys.mac.apps
Organization: SBC http://yahoo.sbc.com
References: <dtz*kBQQq@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk> <3gvqu5FekdddU1@individual.net>
Reply-to: khall@acm.org
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317)
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:11905 comp.sys.mac.system:49177 comp.sys.mac.apps:24635

Ilgaz Ocal wrote:

Nobody still doesn't care, they don'T buy iMac G5 right now, they won'tbuy Mactel iMac because "it doesn't do games"

Jobs isn't switching to Intel because he thinks the gamers will likehim. He's switching because notebooks are where the market is at thethe Pentium M has a much better future for low-power performance thanthe PowerPC.


Kelly

References:
- Re: How many times must Apple make such DRASTIC architecture changes?
  - From: Tim Cutts <timc@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
- Re: How many times must Apple make such DRASTIC architecture changes?
  - From: Ilgaz Ocal <Ilgaz@spamcop.net>

Prev by Date: Re: How many times must Apple make such DRASTIC architecture changes?
Next by Date: Re: New Apple II ethernet card for sale
Previous by thread: Re: How many times must Apple make such DRASTIC architecture changes?
Next by thread: Re: How many times must Apple make such DRASTIC architecture changes?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread