[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Apple II shareware vs. open source (was: Re: Raise the Jolly Roger!)
- Subject: Re: Apple II shareware vs. open source (was: Re: Raise the Jolly Roger!)
- From: Zorin the Lynx <yakko@zorin.org>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 23:31:43 -0500
- In-reply-to: <41f86245_2@127.0.0.1>
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: Florida International University - SCS
- References: <1106766906.924094.76270@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> <ct98ve$shq$1@ottoman.cs.fiu.edu> <41f86245_2@127.0.0.1>
- User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206)
- Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:7432
Exegete wrote:
Is software like Proterm still making the authors a reasonable sum of
money? If not, how come it hasn't been open-sourced?
That's a decision the copyright owners, only, have the right to make.
While it might make sense to you and me, they have the right not to do
so. Even if it only makes enough for a Big Mac each year.
Uhh, where, in my entire message, did I say that it wasn't? DUH, of
course it's the author's decision. I was just curious as to WHY more
Apple II software authors haven't open sourced their work, since the
market isn't really there.
I was hoping for an answer from an author or two, not an obvious
response stated in a condescending way.
-Z
--
Ned Flat: "Why are you acting like this??"
Yakko: "We're not acting. We really are like this."
Wakko: "Aren't we lucky?"
======================================================
Visit http://zorin.org/ for all your whiskery needs!