[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Apple II shareware vs. open source
- Subject: Re: Apple II shareware vs. open source
- From: Exegete <royandjanet@inebraska.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 23:40:04 -0600
- In-reply-to: <ct9qrf$5h5$1@ottoman.cs.fiu.edu>
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: Newsfeeds.com http://www.newsfeeds.com 100,000+ UNCENSORED Newsgroups.
- References: <1106766906.924094.76270@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> <ct98ve$shq$1@ottoman.cs.fiu.edu> <41f86245_2@127.0.0.1> <ct9qrf$5h5$1@ottoman.cs.fiu.edu>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax)
- Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:7433
Zorin the Lynx wrote:
Exegete wrote:
Is software like Proterm still making the authors a reasonable sum of
money? If not, how come it hasn't been open-sourced?
That's a decision the copyright owners, only, have the right to make.
While it might make sense to you and me, they have the right not to do
so. Even if it only makes enough for a Big Mac each year.
Uhh, where, in my entire message, did I say that it wasn't? DUH, of
course it's the author's decision. I was just curious as to WHY more
Apple II software authors haven't open sourced their work, since the
market isn't really there.
I was hoping for an answer from an author or two, not an obvious
response stated in a condescending way.
Then don't ask in an arrogant way.
Roy
-Z