[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RAM Errors with 16K card
- Subject: Re: RAM Errors with 16K card
- From: "Antony Mauget" <amauget@hotmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 13:46:48 +0100
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: les newsgroups par Wanadoo
- References: <4197e24d$0$8312$8fcfb975@news.wanadoo.fr> <20041114221715.07716.00000655@mb-m01.aol.com> <4198a3e1$0$22084$8fcfb975@news.wanadoo.fr> <k%7md.61360$EZ.9957@okepread07> <Hkbmd.178364$9b.53419@edtnps84>
- Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:5693
Thanx to all...
Wayme, the pic shows exactly the card I owned (same chips at the same
places).
"Wayne Stewart" <waynes@telus.dotnet> a �crit dans le message de news:
Hkbmd.178364$9b.53419@edtnps84...
> Scott Alfter wrote:
>
> > It's not. It's intended to go in slot 0 in a II or II+, with a cable
from a
> > socket on the card to one of the RAM sockets (rear left, IIRC...it
should be
> > white instead of black) on the motherboard. With the IIe, this
> > functionality is built in. You want to get at least an extended
80-column
> > card (with 64K) to put in the auxiliary slot; these should be dirt-cheap
on
> > eBay. Something bigger, like a RamWorks (which can hold 1 MB on the
card
> > and had expansion options for another 2 MB or more), would cost a bit
more,
> > but 99% of the software that will run on a IIe will be happy with 128K.
>
> The straps were a cheap way of providing the refresh signal. Some cards
> had the extra few chips so that they didn't need the strap.
> http://homepage.mac.com/wayne_stewart/.Public/pics/strapless.16k.jpg
>
> Wayne