[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Converting .nib images to .dsk images
- Subject: Re: Converting .nib images to .dsk images
- From: Andy McFadden <fadden@fadden.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 07:58:08 GMT
- Newsgroups: alt.games.eamon, comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: faddenInternet, Inc.
- References: <Arcmd.16336$jE2.320@bignews4.bellsouth.net> <pvxmd.7385$tS4.4038@trndny09>
- Sender: Andy McFadden <fadden@adsl-209-204-141-120.sonic.net>
- User-agent: tin/1.4.7-20030322 ("Suggestions") (UNIX) (Linux/2.4.20-8 (i686))
- Xref: g2news1.google.com alt.games.eamon:53 comp.sys.apple2:5711
In comp.sys.apple2 Matthew Clark <clarkbhm@hotmail.com> wrote:
> The reason that it's in a .nib format instead of a .dsk format is that it
> was written on Catakig. According to Catakig's creator, "Catakig can read
> DSK, PO, and NIB disks, but it has its own native format which it prefers,
> and which it uses for both reading and writing floppy disk images. This
> format is a gzip-compressed NIB format, which provides the versatility of
> that format but yields a smaller file size, smaller even than DSK."
I would expect .DSK.gz to be smaller than .NIB.gz. I did a quick test
just now with the CiderPress disk image converter (which uses the zlib
equivalent of the "-9" flag when compressing .gz) and found that the DOS
3.3 system master was 72KB as ".do.gz" and 97KB as ".nib.gz".
Which leads me to believe that, if a ".dsk" image contained nothing but
compressed data, the ".nib.gz" file would actually be larger than the ".dsk".
(Yes, this is entirely academic.)
--
Send mail to fadden@fadden.com (Andy McFadden) - http://www.fadden.com/
CD-Recordable FAQ - http://www.cdrfaq.org/
CiderPress Apple II archive utility for Windows - http://www.faddensoft.com/
Fight Internet Spam - http://spam.abuse.net/spam/ & http://spamcop.net/