[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Iigs comparable to Amiga? Pah!

Subject: Re: Iigs comparable to Amiga? Pah!
From: heuser.marcus@freenet.de (Marcus Heuser)
Date: 13 Oct 2004 01:00:12 -0700
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Organization: http://groups.google.com
References: <BD8F8A50.17E86%delorean@NOSPAMbtconnect.com> <dapnm052b13ve6eopb153s1m0oov1i475m@4ax.com> <416befc1$1_4@127.0.0.1> <1psom09hl3hs4i333lp4ojhuplpk4q16di@4ax.com>
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:5015

Kevin <followthelink@bottomofpost.com> wrote in message news:<1psom09hl3hs4i333lp4ojhuplpk4q16di@4ax.com>...
> On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 10:01:27 -0500, exegete@nunya.biz wrote:
> 
> >I think the problem with the comparison is between the last Amiga and 
> >the IIgs. Try comparing an Amiga 500 to the IIgs, and now the two 
> >machines are competitors, though CPU horsepower still goes to the Amiga.
> >
> >Roy
> 
> I dont agree.  Take a stock IIgs (orig model) and an A500... the Amiga
> has far better Graphics and Sound..

etc. etc.


=> Computer wars! Yippie!

;-)

bye
Marcus

References:
- Iigs comparable to Amiga? Pah!
  - From: Richard Kilpatrick <delorean@NOSPAMbtconnect.com>
- Re: Iigs comparable to Amiga? Pah!
  - From: exegete@nunya.biz
- Re: Iigs comparable to Amiga? Pah!
  - From: Kevin <followthelink@bottomofpost.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Iigs comparable to Amiga? Pah!
Next by Date: Re: Processor Replacement
Previous by thread: Re: Iigs comparable to Amiga? Pah!
Next by thread: Re: Iigs comparable to Amiga? Pah!
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread