<exegete@nunya.biz> wrote in message
411ef18e_5@corp.newsgroups.com">news:411ef18e_5@corp.newsgroups.com...
:
:
: Bill Garber wrote:
:
: > <exegete@nunya.biz> wrote in message
: > 411e9045_5@corp.newsgroups.com">news:411e9045_5@corp.newsgroups.com...
: > :
: > :
: > : Bill Garber wrote:
: > : > <exegete@nunya.biz> wrote in message
: > : > 411e5cab_5@corp.newsgroups.com">news:411e5cab_5@corp.newsgroups.com...
: > : > : Does anyone know what the slowest speed 256K DRAMs that
can
: > be
: > : > used in
: > : > : the IIgs one meg memory card would be? If memory serves
a 1
: > mhz
: > : > 6502
: > : > : needs at least 400 nanosecond chips, so I would assume
200
: > : > nanosecond
: > : > : chips would be a bit too slow for the card. Am I
correct?
: > : > :
: > : > : Roy
: > : >
: > : > 200ns is FASTER than 400ns.
: > :
: > : Absolutely correct, and totally worthless.
: > :
: > : I would have been more accurate if I weren't ill and under
the
: > effects
: > : of prescribed narcotics. What's your excuse?
: >
: > Hey, no need to cop an attitude. I really thought you didn't
: > know.
: > My statement was not meant to be taken the way you apparently
: > did,
: > so, I shall not speak at you again. Sorry, very sorry.
:
: Ok Bill. Let's assume that you have just told us the truth
here. In that
: case, please note that you have corrected my
: misstatement/misunderstanding about 200 vs 400 nanosecond
rating of the
: chips. So, why did you not saying anything about what I really
needed to
: know? Is/Are (I'm still suffering from diminished mental
ability due to
: illness and meds) 200 nanosecond chips fast enough for the
IIgs?
To answer your question, yes they would be fast enough. I see no
noticeable speed change from 70-120 ns simms in the RAM-4-GS, so,
I'd say 150-200 wouldn't be that noticeable either. Sorry if I am
snappy also. I spent 12 days in a hospital bed with NO computers.
:o)
: BTW - it seemed to me that you had made a few other, "snappish"
comments
: in other posts today. Perhaps you are not in the best of moods,
and
: perhaps I'm not reading well(no perhaps there!), that was the
background
: to your unhelpful comment, and my response.
To be honest, I have had no other complaints from anyone else,
unless
they are just not saying anything. I apologize for my quick
response,
as I, too, have new and wonderful meds, not to mention the O2.
Never
before felt so much like an invalid. I will check and recheck
what
I type in the future. Remember to check for my :o) It is the
only
difference between kidding, and serious. :o)))))
: Roy
Thanks for your honesty and open-ness,