[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: sturdy old apple
- Subject: Re: sturdy old apple
- From: Martin Doherty <martin.doherty@undisclosed.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 17:11:48 -0400
- In-reply-to: <ce6ees$ng6$1@hood.uits.indiana.edu>
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.advocacy, comp.sys.apple2
- References: <DoNotSpamthegoat4-626294.18043425072004@library.airnews.net> <ce5jlm$dlb$1@rumours.uwaterloo.ca> <DoNotSpamthegoat4-17CEC8.12523327072004@library.airnews.net> <XixNc.21114$K16.20888@newssvr23.news.prodigy.com> <ce6ees$ng6$1@hood.uits.indiana.edu>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113
- Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.sys.mac.advocacy:26837 comp.sys.apple2:2637
[SNIP ALL]
I liked the story about the sturdiness of the old Apple II compared with
these new-fangled gizmos they are palming off onto us now, but I thought
the subsequent discussion belonged in another group entirely.
Perhaps that could be the case for further such discussion? Please?