[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: sturdy old apple
- Subject: Re: sturdy old apple
- From: glhansen@steel.ucs.indiana.edu (Gregory L. Hansen)
- Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 01:14:59 +0000 (UTC)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.advocacy, comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: Indiana University, Bloomington
- References: <DoNotSpamthegoat4-626294.18043425072004@library.airnews.net> <XixNc.21114$K16.20888@newssvr23.news.prodigy.com> <ce6ees$ng6$1@hood.uits.indiana.edu> <_IzNc.29$5c3.123@news.oracle.com>
- Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.sys.mac.advocacy:26898 comp.sys.apple2:2640
In article <_IzNc.29$5c3.123@news.oracle.com>,
Martin Doherty <martin.doherty@undisclosed.com> wrote:
>
>[SNIP ALL]
>
>I liked the story about the sturdiness of the old Apple II compared with
>these new-fangled gizmos they are palming off onto us now, but I thought
>the subsequent discussion belonged in another group entirely.
>
>Perhaps that could be the case for further such discussion? Please?
I thought discussions of the Macintosh and Apple computers had become
off-topic on csma.
--
"Things should be made as simple as possible -- but no simpler."
-- Albert Einstein