[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Which Apple II?

Subject: Re: Which Apple II?
From: "Chris Alaimo" <cpalaimo@excite.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2003 23:44:10 -0700
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Organization: University of California, Davis
References: <1fwytad.lp0glv2hl8d2N%jamiekg@e3.net.nz> <vfahkmq3cr8562@corp.supernews.com> <pan.2003.06.22.06.44.58.446660@yahoo.com> <1fwxute.8z51pi1ne9bcoN%email@luddite.ca> <bd5cro$n5k$1@woodrow.ucdavis.edu> <8--cnZHS5psE3mujXTWJhw@comcast.com> <1fwz1rc.1ofmawy1qlro7kN%email@luddite.ca>
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:31781

> I wouldn't go so far as to call it superior - just simpler, faster and
> easier on disk space...

That's what I meant.  Less system resources taken up by a fancy GUI.

Chris

References:
- Which Apple II?
  - From: jamiekg@e3.net.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet)
- Re: Which Apple II?
  - From: "Paul Grammens" <grammens@svn.net>
- Re: Which Apple II?
  - From: "Sheldon Simms" <sheldonsimms@yahoo.com>
- Re: Which Apple II?
  - From: email@luddite.ca (Simon Williams)
- Re: Which Apple II?
  - From: "Chris Alaimo" <cpalaimo@excite.com>
- Re: Which Apple II?
  - From: "Bill Garber" <willy46pa@comcast.net>
- Re: Which Apple II?
  - From: email@luddite.ca (Simon Williams)

Prev by Date: Re: Which Apple II?
Next by Date: Re: Which Apple II?
Previous by thread: Re: Which Apple II?
Next by thread: Re: Which Apple II?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread