[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Commodore 64 kills APPLE II
- Subject: Re: Commodore 64 kills APPLE II
- From: "Martin" <martinf@ot.com.au>
- Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 23:36:02 GMT
- Cache-post-path: envoy!unknown@10.70.13.107
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: Open Telecommunications Limited - reports relating to abuse should be sent to timd@ot.com.au
- References: <tAA2a.31975$F25.2892@nwrddc02.gnilink.net> <1045105127.107020@envoy> <b2h2g9$6p6$1@acme.gcfn.org>
- Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:27345
> : (2) Disk drives. The apple disk drives beat the commodore range hands
down !
> : I have numerous Commodore drives at home (1541, 1571, 1581) for my C64s
and
> : 128s and everything I have available for my apples (Duo Disk on the IIe
and
> : 5.25" & 3.5" Apple drives on the IIgs) is much faster and more compact
than
> : the commodore beasts !
>
> Yeah, but how many Apple drives are progrmmable? 8-)
Very valid point dave, but what percentage of users would be programming
their disk drives ?
Surely most just want to load their software from disk into the machine, as
efficiently as possible and nothing more - of course I could be completely
wrong here.
Thanks for pointing this out though.
Cheers
Martin