[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Battle of the Nostalgics



Dosius replied:

>Jeff Blakeney <CUTjblakeney@sentex.net> wrote in message
>news:<gasl4vo2bef01hmf5fbn06btuic9ajsu67@4ax.com>...
>> On 12 Feb 2003 14:03:55 -0800, steve@dosius.zzn.com (Dosius) wrote:
>> 
>> >AOL that, IMAO.  (visit http://catb.org/jargon if you can't parse that!)
>> 
>> Thank you for the link.  I was just about to the point where I was
>> going to ask what AOL stood for as I've never seen it used (at least
>> not like this, now that I've looked it up and know what it is).  The
>> IMAO in this post is a first for me too.  I've seen IMNSHO, though.
>> 
>> However, AOL doesn't really work well the way you've been using it.
>> The way you've used it above translates to "Me too! that, in my
>> arrogant opinion."  :-)
>
>True, but then again, I used to say "Amen that". ;)

"Agree." is shorter, clearer, and more accurate; and it doesn't
denigrate a group of internet users in the bargain.

-michael

Check out amazing quality 8-bit Apple sound on my
Home page:  http://members.aol.com/MJMahon/