[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: DOS 3.3 for 1.40 MB disk, for a system with non-working 80-column code?
Andy McFadden <fadden@fadden.com> wrote in message news:<6KVK9.54791$Ik.1621896@typhoon.sonic.net>...
> As mentioned elsewhere in this thread, LZW is patented, but the patent
> expires in about six months.
Fur�!
-uso.
- References:
- DOS 3.3 for 1.40 MB disk, for a system with non-working 80-column code?
- From: steve@dosius.zzn.com (Dosius)
- Re: DOS 3.3 for 1.40 MB disk, for a system with non-working 80-column code?
- From: Rob Greene <greeneratcharterdotnet>
- Re: DOS 3.3 for 1.40 MB disk, for a system with non-working 80-column code?
- From: steve@dosius.zzn.com (Dosius)
- Re: DOS 3.3 for 1.40 MB disk, for a system with non-working 80-column code?
- From: Rob Greene <greeneratcharterdotnet>
- Re: DOS 3.3 for 1.40 MB disk, for a system with non-working 80-column code?
- From: steve@dosius.zzn.com (Dosius)
- Re: DOS 3.3 for 1.40 MB disk, for a system with non-working 80-column code?
- From: Rob Greene <greeneratcharterdotnet>
- Re: DOS 3.3 for 1.40 MB disk, for a system with non-working 80-column code?
- From: "Charlie" <charlied@NOSPAMbboard.com>
- Re: DOS 3.3 for 1.40 MB disk, for a system with non-working 80-column code?
- From: Rob Greene <greeneratcharterdotnet>
- Re: DOS 3.3 for 1.40 MB disk, for a system with non-working 80-column code?
- From: "Charlie" <charlied@NOSPAMbboard.com>
- Re: DOS 3.3 for 1.40 MB disk, for a system with non-working 80-column code?
- From: Rob Greene <greeneratcharterdotnet>
- Re: DOS 3.3 for 1.40 MB disk, for a system with non-working 80-column code?
- From: Andy McFadden <fadden@fadden.com>