[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Apple II SCSI Card Rev. A

Subject: Re: Apple II SCSI Card Rev. A
From: Mike Spurgeon <mike@spurgeon.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2002 22:25:25 -0800
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com
References: <vIydnYUarI1o82egXTWcqA@comcast.com> <1fn6rx7.y3q4dy1c7pdxkN%dempson@actrix.gen.nz> <YJqcneBYSpp7OmegXTWcqw@comcast.com> <1fn73bn.1o8zu2n1g6i42pN%dempson@actrix.gen.nz>
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:25297

David Empson wrote:
 
> Now, about your use of top quoting... :-)


A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read
text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Apple II SCSI Card Rev. A
  - From: Jeff Blakeney <CUTjblakeney@sentex.net>
- Re: Apple II SCSI Card Rev. A
  - From: "Stephen Shaw" <bottrawler@junkbuster.zzn.com>

References:
- Apple II SCSI Card Rev. A
  - From: "Bill Garber" <willy46pa@comcast.net>
- Re: Apple II SCSI Card Rev. A
  - From: dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson)
- Re: Apple II SCSI Card Rev. A
  - From: "Bill Garber" <willy46pa@comcast.net>
- Re: Apple II SCSI Card Rev. A
  - From: dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson)

Prev by Date: Re: Burning EPROMs
Next by Date: Re: DOS 3.3 for 1.40 MB disk, for a system with non-working 80-column code?
Previous by thread: Re: Apple II SCSI Card Rev. A
Next by thread: Re: Apple II SCSI Card Rev. A
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread