[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Once again musing about "DOS 3.3 for ProDOS"

Subject: Re: Once again musing about "DOS 3.3 for ProDOS"
From: Oliver Schmidt <ol.sc@web.de>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 13:07:16 -0800 (PST)
Complaints-to: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-info: m7g2000vbc.googlegroups.com; posting-host=84.172.149.246; posting-account=48WJTwoAAAAYv4PVIQusNN6porxSkvKD
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Organization: http://groups.google.com
References: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1112131942340.25603@ns383864.ovh.net> <241cd8ab-3a87-4f07-b3a8-b53ce59d0535@y7g2000vbe.googlegroups.com> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1112160958540.26866@ns383864.ovh.net>
User-agent: G2/1.0

Hi Steve,

> But I've dealt with a few DOS programs where they do things
> BASIC.SYSTEM doesn't like (a lot of chargens do that), or they access DOS
> through the print chr$(4) trick in machine code (almost anything
> compiled)

The latter seems not to hard to archive - at least at first glance:
One might install an own COUT hook and call BASIC.SYSTEMs DOSCMD if a
CHR$(4) is found...

Regards,
Oliver

References:
- Once again musing about "DOS 3.3 for ProDOS"
  - From: Steve Nickolas <lyricalnanoha@usotsuki.hoshinet.org>
- Re: Once again musing about "DOS 3.3 for ProDOS"
  - From: Oliver Schmidt <ol.sc@web.de>
- Re: Once again musing about "DOS 3.3 for ProDOS"
  - From: Steve Nickolas <lyricalnanoha@usotsuki.hoshinet.org>

Prev by Date: Say hello to "Hebrew II Plus" by Anthro-Digital, Inc.
Next by Date: Re: Say hello to "Hebrew II Plus" by Anthro-Digital, Inc.
Previous by thread: Re: Once again musing about "DOS 3.3 for ProDOS"
Next by thread: Why I like the Apple II?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread