[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 65c02 in ][+ problem

Subject: Re: 65c02 in ][+ problem
From: Wayne Stewart <waynes@intergate.ca>
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2001 15:27:14 -0800
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com
References: <eeMKPCeXaioVpdFdENA9175rMIMo@4ax.com> <1f3w42i.1w039qopbbmucN%dempson@actrix.gen.nz> <3C0C6890.C4B65EA2@intergate.ca> <joANPIfqckyWzcX7vPUgsSITQwU7@4ax.com> <3C0DAE0B.760644F4@intergate.ca> <3c0de9de$1@news.uow.edu.au>
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:15401

David Wilson wrote:

> According to Jim Sather, only the Rockwell 65c02 will work in an Apple ][+.
> The NCR/GTE part requires the data bus to be set up for longer than the Apple
> ][+ does.

Yes but he did mention that he did limited experiments with only 4 different
chips.
While one of them was a GTE, it was a 2 mhz version while the one I'm using is a
1mhz chip that was made several years after he did his experiments. Were the specs

tightened up in later production chips?

    Wayne

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 65c02 in ][+ problem
  - From: david@uow.edu.au (David Wilson)

References:
- 65c02 in ][+ problem
  - From: John L <jd@logotech.8m.com>
- Re: 65c02 in ][+ problem
  - From: dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson)
- Re: 65c02 in ][+ problem
  - From: Wayne Stewart <waynes@intergate.ca>
- Re: 65c02 in ][+ problem
  - From: John L <jd@logotech.8m.com>
- Re: 65c02 in ][+ problem
  - From: Wayne Stewart <waynes@intergate.ca>
- Re: 65c02 in ][+ problem
  - From: david@uow.edu.au (David Wilson)

Prev by Date: Re: what happened to the Treasure Chest Project?
Next by Date: Re: 65c02 in ][+ problem
Previous by thread: Re: 65c02 in ][+ problem
Next by thread: Re: 65c02 in ][+ problem
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread