Re: Update: Win2k to IIgs

["Tim Haynes" <trhaynes@yahoo.SPAMBGONE.com>]

Awesome job, William!  I suckered myself with the old "cable switcheroo",
too, at one point.  :)

I haven't been motivated enough to mess around with the user permissions in
W2K.  If I get a chance over the Christmas holidays, I may try to get more
secure logins happening... right now I am happy just using the Guest. :)

Cheers, and happy networking!!
Tim

"william strutts" <wrstrutts1@nospam.home.com> wrote in message
news:4FqD7.209829$K6.103193035@news2...
> "Tim Haynes" <trhaynes@yahoo.SPAMBGONE.com> wrote in message
> news:jepD7.101121$YL3.29156386@news3.rdc1.on.home.com...
> >
> > Good stuff, William!  It's exciting to get the IIgs networked, eh?  :)
> >
> > Your network problems could be either from the IIgs side or the Mac
side.
> > It's been a while since I was doing any networking on a Mac, but I
recall
> > having to enable sharing on the Mac volume, and specifying that the
guest
> > could see it.  And on the IIgs side, I had to have the port set up
> properly
> > (ROM01 and ROM03 AppleTalk port setup differences: slot 1 or 2 set to
> "your
> > card"/Slot 7 set to "AppleTalk" - for ROM01.  Slot 1 or 2 set to
> "AppleTalk"
> > for ROM03.)  On the IIgs, you have install the AppleShare extension from
> the
> > Sys 6.0.1 installer.
> >
> > Were you ever able to see the Mac from the IIgs but now it's not
working,
> or
> > were you not ever able to see it?
> >
> > Cheers!
> > Tim
> >
>
> IT WORKS!!!!!!!
>
> I had the printer cable and the Appletalk cable mixed up when
> I plugged them back into the Mac after the upgrade. Once I
> swapped the cables, the IIgs saw the Mac and the Windows
> 2000 servers!!!! I then proceeded to log onto the Win2k
> server as a user and not a guest. I remember people saying
> that you couldn't log into the Win2k server as a real user but
> only as a guest.
>
> --
> --
> William R. Strutts - wrstrutts1@nospam.home.com - Whatever!
>
> C'est moi!  http://www.facelink.com/wrstrutts
>
> Just hacking away...
>
> Remove nospam to reply.
>
>
>