[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: If you could design a $300 homecomputer today, what would you choose?
In article <tas-699F55.15411517072001@news>,
Timothy A. Seufert <tas@mindspring.com> wrote:
> "8-bit legacy of the 286"? The 286 was a 16-bit CPU.
.... designed to be backwards compatible to the 8088/8088, which were
designed to be partially backwards compatible to the 8-bit CPU's
8080/8008 (the x86 isn't binary compatible, but the CPU registers
of the 8086/88/286 have a striking resemblance to the CPU registers
of the 8080/8008 !!!)
> So were the 8086 and 8088. The 8088 had an 8-bit wide data bus for
> reduced system costs compared to the 8086, but the instruction sets
> were identical and both were legitimately 16-bit CPUs. Address space
> was 20 bits (1MB); the 16-bit segment number is shifted to the left 4
> bits and then added to the 16-bit offset to form an address.
The address space of the 286 was 24 bit, although those 16 MB of
memory was addressable only in protected mode -- in real mode, the
286 could address 1 MB + 64 KB.
--
----------------------------------------------------------------
Paul Schlyter, Swedish Amateur Astronomer's Society (SAAF)
Grev Turegatan 40, S-114 38 Stockholm, SWEDEN
e-mail: pausch at saaf dot se or paul.schlyter at ausys dot se
WWW: http://hotel04.ausys.se/pausch http://welcome.to/pausch