[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: System Saver IIgs -- ID of burned part?-- line protection
- Subject: Re: System Saver IIgs -- ID of burned part?-- line protection
- From: mjmahon@aol.com (Michael J. Mahon)
- Date: 03 Jul 2001 17:07:03 GMT
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: AOL http://www.aol.com
- References: <3B415161.36343911@usa.net>
- Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:9912
w_tom replied:
> I protected one half of a house with what I now know to be a grossly
>undersized MOV surge protector - 39 joules. When lightning directly struck
>the
>pole, everything - yes, everything electronics on the unprotected side was
>destroyed. Nothing - then or weeks later - was damaged on the protected
>side.
>However a month later, my friend called with no power on the protected side.
>The
>grossly undersized MOV shunted so much power to earth ground through the
>meter,
>that that side of a partially damaged meter completely failed when he turned
>on
>his air conditioner.
>
> Yes, even that grossly undersized MOV provided effective surge protection.
>But
>it had an advantage. It was only 2 feet to an earth ground rod in conductive
>soil. Of course and obviously, a surge protector is only as good as its
>earth
>ground. This earth ground was both short and conductive meaning that even a
>grossly undersized MOV was sufficient protection - albeit only for one surge.
Yes, and in this case the MOV was functionally equivalent to a spark gap!
-michael
Email: mjmahon@aol.com
Home page: http://members.aol.com/MJMahon/