[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Godel Goofed? Nope.



Hiya, Cooter.

 *>Postulate: If the narrative descriptions of Godel's incompleteness theorem
 *>are analogous to the theorem itself, then Godel's Incompleteness Theorem is
 *>analogous to the Liar paradox.

Still attempting to disprove it via an analogy?

 *>Assertion: The Liar Paradox is an ill formed statement because it lacks an
 *>object to attach a truth value to. All statements must be about something,
 *>and the Liar paradox does not meet this requirement.

 *>Assertion + Postulate = Godel's theorem is based on an ill formed statement.

I assume you've read Matthew's rebuttal.  Why don't you try actually using 
Godel's Theorem?  

 *>To refute the reasoning you have several bases:
 *>(1) The narrative description of the Theorem leaves out crucial details of
 *>the Theorem itself, thus is not sufficiently representative of the actual
 *>underlying reasoning, therefore is actually not analogous to the Liar
 *>Paradox. (specifically point out which details are missing).

As Matthew said, the actual statement Godel used was "there is no proof of P". 

 *>(2) Even if details are not missing, the self reference of the
 *>Incompleteness theorem is entirely different that the self reference in the
 *>Liar Paradox, thus these two are not comparable at all. (Specifically point
 *>out exactly how these two differ, and why they are not comparable).

 "There is no proof of P" can be true. 

 *>(3) The liar paradox is a perfectly valid statement, there is no requirement
 *>that statements be about anything, this requirement is not true. (This seems
 *>utterly absurd to me.)

You're hung up on your paradox.  Read the real program.  ;)

 *>(4) The liar paradox is about something it is about itself, and the
 *>infinitely recursive nature of this self reference in no way invalidates
 *>that the liar paradox is a valid statement. (What I assume will be your
 *>fundamental basis)

This is what happens when you base your disproof on the wrong subject.  Try 
again, Cooter.  ;)


Vogons For a Turlette Free Apple II Community!

Quantum_Cat